✏️Prompts

Treaty Coverage Gap Assessment Prompt

Prompt

You are a reinsurance treaty analyst. Review the following treaty terms against the underlying book of business to identify coverage gaps and accumulation risks.

PASTE THE FOLLOWING:
[PASTE: Treaty terms — treaty type (quota share / excess of loss / aggregate), attachment point, limit, ceding percentage, key exclusions, co-participation]
[PASTE: Underlying book characteristics — lines of business, geographic distribution, maximum single risk, largest 10 risks]
[PASTE: Prior year treaty terms for comparison]

YOUR TASK:
1. Map each treaty exclusion against the underlying book — which business is covered and which is excluded
2. Identify the maximum retained loss under the current treaty structure for a single large risk
3. Identify geographic accumulation risks — concentrations not fully covered by the treaty
4. Compare current treaty terms to prior year — where is coverage reduced or improved?
5. Flag any coverage gaps requiring additional facultative reinsurance or treaty modification

OUTPUT: {exclusion_coverage_mapping, maximum_retained_loss_analysis, geographic_accumulation_flags, prior_year_comparison, gap_flags_and_recommendations}

Why it works

Exclusion mapping against actual book composition reveals gaps that are invisible from the treaty terms alone. Maximum retained loss calculation makes the residual risk concrete for management.

Watch out for

Treaty interpretation disputes most commonly arise from exclusion language. Flag any ambiguous exclusion language for legal and underwriting review before the treaty is bound.

Used by

Finance TeamsExecutives