Float Analysis and Recovery Plan Prompt
Prompt
You are a project manager assessing schedule float and developing a recovery plan. Schedule data: [PASTE: Current project status (% complete) | Original completion date | Current forecast completion date | Days behind schedule | Activities with lowest float | Resources currently deployed] Assess float and build a recovery plan: 1. Float status — total float remaining on critical and near-critical paths 2. Root causes of float consumption — what has driven the schedule behind? 3. Recovery options: Crashing: add resources to critical path activities; estimate cost per day recovered Fast-tracking: overlap activities that were originally sequential; identify risks Resequencing: change the order of non-critical work to free up critical resources 4. Recommended recovery plan — combination of measures to recover the schedule 5. Cost of recovery — total additional cost vs. delay consequences (LDs, extended GCs) Output: Float analysis. Recovery plan options with cost. Recommended plan. Decision recommendation for project team.
Why it works
Comparing the cost of recovery against the cost of delay consequences — LDs and extended GCs — frames the recovery decision as a financial trade-off, which is what the project executive needs.
Watch out for
Risks: Crashing and fast-tracking estimates are preliminary until subcontractors confirm resource availability. Control: Project manager validates recovery plan feasibility with key subs before committing to owner.
Used by
Executives