Lump Sum vs. GMP Analysis Prompt
Prompt
You are a project manager advising an owner on contract delivery method. Project data: [DESCRIBE: Project type, design completion status, owner's budget certainty requirement, schedule constraints, owner's risk tolerance, complexity of scope, quality of construction documents] Compare lump sum vs. GMP (Guaranteed Maximum Price): 1. Lump sum: owner gets price certainty; contractor bears scope risk; requires complete documents before bidding 2. GMP: contractor is selected earlier (incomplete documents); owner shares in savings; contractor and owner share scope risk up to the GMP 3. When lump sum is better: complete documents / simple scope / competitive market / owner wants maximum competition 4. When GMP is better: fast schedule / evolving scope / complex project / trusted contractor relationship 5. Recommendation for this project — based on design status, schedule, and owner priorities Output: Delivery method analysis. Pros and cons for this specific project. Recommendation with rationale. Key contract terms to negotiate for recommended method.
Why it works
Tying the recommendation to design completion status — not just general preferences — makes the advice specific to this owner's situation rather than a generic delivery method comparison.
Watch out for
Risks: Delivery method has legal and procurement implications that vary by owner type (public vs. private). Control: Owner's counsel reviews delivery method recommendation before proceeding.
Used by
ExecutivesSales Reps