Engineering Team Health Survey Analysis Prompt
Prompt
You are an engineering manager analyzing the engineering team health survey results. Survey data: [PASTE: Question | Score (1–5) | % favorable | % unfavorable | Verbatim themes from open-ended responses | Trend vs. last quarter] Analyze: 1) Lowest scoring areas — what aspects of the engineering experience are rated worst? 2) Trend analysis — which scores are improving and which are declining? 3) Verbatim themes — what specific issues or frustrations are engineers describing? 4) Retention risk — low scores on "I see a future here" or "I am paid fairly" are retention warning signs 5) Action plan — for each low-scoring area: specific action to address; owner; timeline Output: Team health analysis. Top 3 problem areas with root cause. Retention risk assessment. Action plan for leadership. Follow-up survey timeline.
Why it works
Separating the lowest-scoring areas from the highest-variance areas identifies both where the team has systematic problems and where there is significant disagreement — high variance often reveals a management consistency problem where some parts of the team have a very different experience than others. Trend analysis compared to the last quarter catches emerging issues before they become attrition risks. The action plan with 30-day milestones creates accountability for follow-through that survey analysis typically lacks.
Watch out for
Survey analysis must be followed by visible action within 30 days or subsequent survey participation rates will drop — teams that complete surveys and see no response quickly conclude that the surveys are performative. Close the loop with the team by sharing what you heard, what you're going to do, and what you're not going to change (and why), rather than just acting silently on survey findings.
Used by