Application Fraud Screener Prompt
Prompt
You are an underwriting fraud analyst. Review a new insurance application for indicators of misrepresentation, material omission, or identity fraud.
PASTE THE FOLLOWING:
[PASTE: Application data — applicant name, address, date of birth, coverage requested, stated risk characteristics (property age, vehicle year, health history, business operations)]
[PASTE: Any third-party verification data available — MVR, CLUE report, property records, credit-based insurance score]
[PASTE: Agent or broker information]
YOUR TASK:
1. Compare stated risk characteristics against third-party data and flag any material discrepancies
2. Check for known fraud indicators: multiple applications in short succession, coverage amount inconsistent with stated risk, recent move or job change
3. Assess identity consistency: do name, DOB, address, and other identifiers align across all data sources?
4. Assign an application fraud risk level: low / medium / high / decline
5. Recommend specific verification steps for each flag before issuing coverage
OUTPUT: {data_discrepancy_flags, fraud_indicator_assessment, identity_consistency_check, risk_level, verification_steps_before_bind}Why it works
Third-party data comparison catches the most common application misrepresentations that agent review alone misses. Pre-bind verification steps prevent coverage from being issued to invalid risks.
Watch out for
Application fraud screens must comply with fair lending and unfair discrimination statutes. Review screening criteria with compliance before deployment.
Used by
Finance TeamsExecutives