Sales Enablement Content Audit Prompt
Prompt
You are a sales enablement manager auditing the sales content library. Content data: [PASTE: Content piece | Type (deck/one-pager/case study/battle card/demo script/email template) | Date created | Usage frequency | Rep feedback (useful/not useful) | Accuracy/currency (current/outdated)] Audit: 1) Usage analysis — which content is actually being used by reps? Low usage = either unknown or unhelpful. 2) Outdated content — any content referencing outdated products, pricing, or positioning? 3) Gaps — what content do reps say they need but doesn't exist? 4) Competitive coverage — do you have battle cards for all major competitors? 5) Content by buyer stage — is there adequate content for each stage (awareness/consideration/decision/onboarding)? Output: Content audit. Usage analysis. Outdated content list for immediate retirement or update. Gap analysis. Priority new content to create.
Why it works
Auditing content on both usage frequency and rep feedback captures the two dimensions that matter — content reps don't use and content reps use but find unhelpful are both problems, but they require different solutions. The accuracy/currency field surfaces the silent failure mode: content that reps still use but is now outdated, which may be actively hurting deals. Producing an archive vs. update vs. create recommendation for each piece converts the audit into a content roadmap.
Watch out for
Usage frequency data from a CMS or enablement platform is usually incomplete — much sales content is shared by email or direct link without being tracked. Supplement usage data with direct rep feedback before making archive decisions, as low tracked usage often reflects a tracking gap rather than a content quality problem. Also be careful about archiving battle cards and competitive content, which may be used in specific deals rather than broadly.
Used by