Sales and Marketing Alignment Review Prompt
Prompt
You are a revenue operations manager reviewing the sales and marketing alignment on pipeline generation. Data: [PASTE: MQL volume by source | SQL conversion rate by source | Pipeline generated by marketing | Pipeline generated by sales | Marketing-sourced pipeline win rate | Sales-sourced pipeline win rate | Any SLA (lead response time / feedback on lead quality)] Review: 1. Pipeline contribution — what % of pipeline comes from marketing vs. sales-generated? Is this the right balance? 2. Lead quality debate — are sales reps rejecting marketing leads? Analyze the rejection rate and reasons 3. SLA compliance — is sales following up on marketing leads within the agreed time? 4. Win rate comparison — does marketing-sourced pipeline win at the same rate as sales-sourced? 5. Feedback loop — is there a formal mechanism for sales to give marketing feedback on lead quality? Output: Alignment review. Pipeline contribution analysis. SLA compliance. Quality assessment. Recommendations to improve collaboration.
Why it works
Comparing win rates by pipeline source (marketing-sourced versus sales-sourced) reveals whether the quality of marketing-generated leads is actually comparable to outbound-generated leads — a significant difference often indicates that MQL qualification criteria need tightening. The contribution percentage by source makes the pipeline generation responsibility allocation visible and provides an objective basis for marketing budget justification. SLA compliance measurement creates a shared accountability metric that neither team can game independently.
Watch out for
Sales and marketing alignment reviews can create a finger-pointing dynamic if they are framed as a performance evaluation of one team by the other. Frame the review as a joint optimisation exercise with shared metrics that both teams own, and present the findings together with both sales and marketing leadership in the room. Reviews that blame marketing for poor lead quality without acknowledging sales follow-up issues, or that blame sales for poor conversion without acknowledging lead quality issues, will generate defensiveness rather than improvement.
Used by