Inventory Impairment Assessment Prompt
Prompt
You are a financial controller assessing whether an inventory impairment charge is required. Inventory data: [PASTE: Product line | Inventory value | Expected future selling price | Estimated sales volume (next 12 months) | Any events triggering impairment review (market decline, product discontinuation, technology obsolescence)] Triggering event assessment: Significant decline in selling prices — current market price vs. carrying value Physical deterioration — damage, expiry, or obsolescence since purchase Changes in market conditions — customer loss, competitive pricing, technology shift Management decision to discontinue product — carrying value vs. NRV For each triggering event: Quantify the potential impairment Determine if write-down is required under LCNRV Journal entry required Output: Impairment assessment workpaper. Total potential write-down. Journal entry. Disclosure requirement if material. Inventory Capitalization Policy Review
Why it works
The triggering event assessment is what distinguishes a routine period-end review from a required impairment assessment — under US GAAP, impairment must be assessed when specific events suggest the carrying value may not be recoverable. NRV calculation (expected selling price minus disposal costs) is required under both GAAP and IFRS and this prompt explicitly operationalises the calculation. The auditor notification requirement for material impairments builds the governance step into the assessment process.
Watch out for
Inventory impairment requires significant judgement about future selling prices and demand that may be difficult to support in audit — overly optimistic NRV assumptions that avoid recognition of an impairment loss will attract auditor scrutiny. Document the basis for all NRV estimates (recent transactions, market data, customer orders) and be conservative in assumptions for items where market evidence is limited.
Used by